Summing up our peer reviews

The peer reviews were pretty helpful. However, I found that for many of them it was “garbage in garbage out.” I became fustrated after the second review when it began to seem as though people were just throwing stuff up (a rough outline at best) and then asked for specifiic questions when it seemed like they didn’t even make an effort to do what they asked for the reviewer to do. For instance, no citations at all and then ask “what should I do for references.”

It’s always important to get the perspective of the audience before publishing your work. I do this all of the time at work when I have one of my peers review my newsletters or other types of written communication. As the author, I know what I want to say but my writing does not always come across with my intention. I found this to be true for the class as well.

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.