My writing technology draft
Upon my first reading of the assignment, requiring the invention of a writing technology, I thought it would be rather quick, easy, and simple. From choosing the materials, to the actual process of using the materials I was able to make direct connections to my own writing. The practicality aspect of creating my own writing technology led me to examine my personal style, rhetoric, and the various purposes of my writing.
As with many things, some tasks appear straight forward on the surface level. However, as we begin to delve into the task at hand our knowledge base regarding the particulars of the project increases, complexities emerge which require more physical and mental energy. Creating my own writing technology followed this model of starting off with initial surface assumptions that led to a more substantial understanding of theories and practices that can then be applied in an array of real world settings.
The charge of inventing my own writing technology seemed to be a basic way to pave the way for the content of the course. Only requiring 20 words or text, I began to think of how I could physically construct the actual text without using any modern conveniences such as pens, paper, and especially my personal computer. The instructions were pretty clear. Use something or some things to convey a message of some sort.
In exploring the various unorthodox materials I have personally used to communicate, I discovered an almost unending list of off art supplies, food items, and electronic technology. Working in an elementary school and having three children of my own has presented me with a plethora of opportunities to step out of the traditional methods of communication. From creating a Christmas present for grandparents to celebrating another year of my children’s lives through frosting, chocolate syrup, and whip cream, I became a little hard pressed to find a novel method of writing a text.
To assist in the process of locating materials, I asked myself how I would manage to do this if it were only up to me. Answering the question of what could I access naturally and use effectively without any type of modern device or product. Not fully believing that the total absence of modern convenience was necessary for the project, I was convinced that this line of thinking would truly lead me to my own ingenuity and would lead to a process in which my text could be successful.
Finding the materials was simple enough; I used resources found in nature. The acquisition of black cherry juice, birch bark, a feather, and a rock was assisted by the plentiful environment of Grand Traverse County. Fresh in season, the cherries were dark and ripe. The birch bark was found in abundance upon the forest floor. Feathers actually floated towards me, propelled by a breeze along the shore line. The material came together seamlessly. Even the rock I plucked out of my cottage’s garden was easy enough to acquire.
Believing that not only did a dark cherry indicate sweeter juice but also that darker pigment to be used in place of ink quickly led to my decision. I knew that I would need a dark stain in order to effectively write my text. One of the requirements of the projects was that the text needed to be visual as opposed to tactile so that the other students as well as my professor could actually experience my invented technology in an electronic format. A bumpy surface would not transfer well in electronically.
Although the identification and acquirement of the materials did not produce any major obstacles, the actual application proved to be rather tricky. As I began to use a spoon to mash up my cherries in a plastic container, I realized that I subconsciously chose manmade resources even though I set out specifically to do the exact opposite. As Ong (1986) points out, “ The fact that we do not commonly feel the influence of writing on our thoughts shows that we have interiorized the technology of writing so deeply that without tremendous effort we cannot separate it from ourselves or even recognize its presence and influence.” I was pretty surprised by this discovery and quickly problem solved by grabbing two rocks that lay nearby to grind my cherries into a pulp.
The manual labor that went into creating my technology was also beyond my basic assumptions. The birch needed to be prepared a few days in advance as it was water logged from the previous night’s rain, spotted with moss, and still had pieces of the wood which initially composed the bulk of the tree and was now in a state of semi decay. In my mind, I pictured a pristine white surface that would serve as a near perfect surface for my writing. Once the bark dried out and the imperfections in the surface became apparent, I realized that only a small portion of the bark would be salvageable. Luckily, my advanced planning on obtaining an extra-large piece of bark in hopes that I would be able to practice my technique provided me with just enough space upon which I could write my text. The usable area turned out to be roughly one fifth of the entire piece,.
Reference to obtaining surfaces suitable for writing and the preparation of man made materials. Include history of ink, pencils, and the effectiveness of technology as it is invented and adapted into standard writing practices.
Choosing the actual text provided its own complexities. At first I thought I would be cleaver and come up with a witty retort to tie into the overall concept of the project. The paradox of using the text to express the desire to use technologies already available to fulfill the requirement to invent my own technology was appealing. However, upon further reflection of my word choice, I examined how my writing would be received by the reader and if the reader would understand the actual meaning and purpose of the text. Since additional explanation may be required to interpret the text to my intended meaning, a complaint dating as far back as Socrates (Ong 1986), I decided to choose words that could be easily understood and would stand on their own in the absence of further explanation.
The absence of meaning through context renders any text useless, as the overall purpose of a text is to convey on idea (Ong 1987). By using the objective text of the names of my family and my children’s birthdates, the reader automatically receives information that can be applied to the real world. Upon reading the text it is clear that the names are linked together. The use of our common last name implies a filial relationship. Furthermore, the use of birthdates identifies a time period in which to place my family. The reader can successfully take the outlined text and obtain accurate information that they may not otherwise know.
Even though the phrase “love grows deep” could be interpreted in a variety of ways the proximity in relation to the object information provides a context in which the abstract thought can be applied. Pairing concrete facts with abstract ideas leads to a deeper understanding and is the basis for logical philosophy. (reference) In regards to my specific text, the placement of my family’s information alongside a figurative form of speech supports the presence of love amongst my family members. As the function of writing is to convey information or an idea, I believe my project was successful.
***There are a few supporting references that I am torn between using. Since I am extremely close and my chosen references would have put me a few pages beyond the requested format, I feel that feedback at this point will help narrow down my options and help convey a clear understanding in regards to the process of inventing my writing technology and how it relates to the history and development of writing technologies.***
Jul 08, 2010 @ 18:46:07
Although I appreciated the steps of the journey in creating a new writing technology, I would suggest expounding further on the ideas mentioned toward the end of the essay in reference to meaning, context and intended audience. I found your final piece to have a definite aesthetic appeal in the way the natural materials married together to convey the text, it turned out beautifully.
Jul 09, 2010 @ 03:16:09
Dr. Krause said we direct the paper toward a general audience, so perhaps name what you are referring to in your 3rd paragraph when you mention the course. I didn’t do it either, not sure if it’s necessary.
In the 7th paragraph, remove the word ‘in’ from the last sentence.
I like the connection to modern technologies and Ong’s writing in the 8th paragraph. I’m wondering if you could use some other references out of the Baron or Manguel articles to support some of your process description. Perhaps this is what you were referring to after the 9th paragraph.
Change ‘cleaver’ to ‘clever’ in 10th paragraph.
I like the information about intended meaning in the 10th paragraph. Good connection to text.
In your introduction, you wrote “The practicality aspect of creating my own writing technology led me to examine my personal style, rhetoric, and the various purposes of my writing.”. This sounds like a Thesis statement to me, but you didn’t specifically reference the rhetoric or various purposes of my writing section. If that isn’t the thesis, you might consider creating a more obvious one that presents an explicit purpose to the essay.
I think you’ll be OK adding references. You are only at 1255 approx words, and we were told about 1500. Try to summarize as much as possible. I was told by another prof that summaries are actually read more carefully than direct quotes. Just a thought as it might save on space.
Overall, I like your description and reflections regarding your discoveries throughout the essay. Your writing flows nicely.
Jul 09, 2010 @ 20:57:14
I really enjoyed that even though at first things were smooth sailing and simple you catch your self in time to learn the lesson. Your Ong example was used perfectly. you also took the time to understand your mistake and went back to get those rocks to grind your cherreis. You learned something valuable from this project and that is the whole point ! nicely done!
-The paradox of using the text to express the desire to use technologies already available to fulfill the requirement to invent my own technology was appealing.
That particular sentence was really confusing. Consider rewrite so it registers more clearly. I had to reread 3 times before i understood what you meant by it.
-I like that you chose to use your family, more specifically dates, as your text. It make it personal and easy to relate to.
Overall, you have a great start. It seems like you really learned something and understand the complexity between writing and meaning which you applied well through your choice to use your family in text. I enjoyed your essay!
Jul 10, 2010 @ 14:31:23
Thank you very much for the comments! It was exactly what I was hoping for. I do agree that the sentence was “appealing” does seem like one of those that I know what I mean, but everyone else may be a bit perplext. To me I think I wrote it as I would talk in a conversation. Thank you for the observation!
I do plan on using the first statement as a thesis statement, that’s where I was running into trouble with trying to do too much. I am going to switch it around a bit to narrow down the scope.
I do find it a bit funny that I used “cleaver” instead of “clever”. It must have been a Freudian slip!
Once again thank you for the feedback, it is exactly the kind of direction that really helps!